Jurisprudencia

  • Detalles del asunto
    • ID nacional: AP de Málaga (Sección 4ª) Sentencia núm. 337/2009 de 30 junio
    • Estado miembro: España
    • Denominación común:link
    • Tipo de resolución: Resolución judicial recurrida
    • Fecha de la resolución: 30/06/2009
    • Órgano jurisdiccional: Audiencia Provincial de Málaga
    • Asunto:
    • Demandante: INFINITY SYSTEM S.L. and HIPERSOL SUPERMERCADOS, S.L
    • Demandado: Unknown
    • Palabras clave: right of withdrawal, terms and conditions, terms & conditions
  • Artículos de la Directiva
    Distance Selling Directive, link
  • Nota preliminar
    The withdrawal term must be counted as from the moment where the consumer effectively receives the product, regardless whether this is the purchase moment or a latter one.
  • Hechos
    The plaintiff purchased a TV. When the TV was delivered, he detected that it was defective. He claim in front of the seller and, per the latter's indications, also in front of the manufacturer (the defendants). The manufacturer delivered a new TV to the consumer (the plaintiff). However, it was a different model and price TV that did not satisfied the defendant, who decided to reject the product.
  • Cuestión jurídica
    What is the right moment to start counting the withdrawal right term?
  • Decisión

    Calculation of the right of withdrawal's term. The concept of effective receipt by the consumer.

    Texto completo: Texto completo

  • Asuntos relacionados

    No hay resultados disponibles

  • Literatura jurídica

    No hay resultados disponibles

  • Resultado
    The court ruled in favour of the plaintiff. As a consequence, the defendants were ordered to return the price to the purchaser and to pick the TV up from the plaintiff's domicile at their expense.