Rättspraxis

  • Uppgifter om ärendet
    • Nationellt id-nummer: MD 2013:7
    • Medlemsstat: Sverige
    • Vedertaget namn:N/A
    • Beslutstyp: Domstolsbeslut överklagat
    • Beslutsdatum: 30/04/2013
    • Domstol: Marknadsdomstolen
    • Ämne:
    • Kärande: The Consumer Ombudsman (sw. Konsumentombudsmannen)
    • Svarande: Z.M. with registered name Maxi Elit Norrköping
    • Nyckelord: administrative authority, authorisation, endorsement
  • Direktivartiklar
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Annex I, 4.
  • Huvudanmärkning
    Marketing products without the mandatory permission from the competent authority constitutes a blacklisted commercial practice.
  • Omständigheter
    The defendant had marketed diet- and health products on its website. The products contained ingredients classified as pharmaceuticals but the products were not approved or registered by the Medical Products Agency. This was a behavior contrary to law.
  • Juridisk fråga
    Does advertising and marketing products without the mandatory permission of the competent authority constitute a blacklisted commercial practice?
  • Beslut

    The court found that the products should be considered pharmaceuticals and since the Medical Products Agency had not approved or registered the sale of the products, the marketing thereof constitutes a blacklisted commercial practice as it was claimed that the product was authorized by the competent public body.

    Hela texten: Hela texten

  • Ärendesamband

    Inga träffar

  • Doktrin

    Inga träffar

  • Resultat
    The marketing was found to constitute unfair marketing practice and the plaintiff was granted its request.