Portál evropské e-Justice - Case Law
Zavřít

BETA VERZE PORTÁLU JE JIŽ K DISPOZICI!

Vyzkoušejte si BETA verzi evropského portálu e-Justice a dejte nám vědět, jak se Vám s ní pracuje!

 
 

menu starting dummy link

Page navigation

menu starting dummy link

Case Details

Case Details
National ID II.ÚS 419/14
členský stát Česká republika
Common Name link
Decision type Jiné
Decision date 07/05/2014
Soud Ústavní soud ČR
Předmět
Žalobce Unicampus, o. s.
Žalovaný District court in Hradec Králové
Klíčová slova case law, consumer, consumer rights organisation, court, harmonisation

Injunctions Directive, Article 3, (b)

When there is a conflict between national laws and laws of the European Union, it is always necessary to use such interpretation of the national law, that is in compliance with the law of the European Union. This is also valid for the Directive 2009/22/EC.
The defendant decided earlier in a case of the plaintiff. The plaintiff questioned the previous decision, because the defendant did not refer a question for preliminary ruling in this case to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The plaintiff stated that the preliminary ruling should have been used because of conflict of national law with the Directive 2009/22/EC. Hence, the plaintiff filed this complaint to the the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic for breaching his right to fair process.
Is it possible to keep national laws contrary to the Directive 2009/22/EC?
The defendant used correct interpretation of national laws according to the Directive 2009/22/EC and its decision was made correctly. It was not necessary to use the preliminary ruling. The right to fair process of the plaintiff was not injured.
Full Text: Full Text

No results available

Member State Title Author
Česká republika Předběžné opatření vydané v meritu věci v kontextu unijního a ústavního práva Jan Vavrečka, Nicole Grmelová
The complaint was rejected as groundless.