The part of the judgment of the Court of Appeal which upheld the Court of First Instance's dismissal of the claimant's claims for the unlawful unilateral termination of the loan contract and obliges the defendant to execute the contract, remains unchanged.
The part of the judgment of the Court of Appeal which upheld parts of the order of the Court of First Instance to dismiss the claimant's claims to replace the unfair loan clause of 0.2 interest rate is annulled. As a result of this part of the case, the Court adopted a new decision: the loan contract concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant with a penalty of 0.2% interest rate is declared unfair and invalid from the moment the contract was concluded.
The Court decided to eliminate another part of the appeal, and returned that part of the case to the Court of First Instance for re-examination.