During a routine examination of a grocery store, the Consumer Protection Authorities found that certain products were significantly overpriced compared to their displayed price, and that the store was not indicating prices of several other products at the places of offering. The store claimed that the price tags had not yet been exchanged for newer ones. As a result, a significant fine was levied against the store by the Consumer Protection Authority, which was justified by this not being the store’s first infraction in this regard. This was appealed by the store in an administrative process, but the second authority upheld the first authority’s decision. As a consequence, the store requested judicial review, but the Court of First Instance found in favour of the competition authorities and upheld their decisions. This led to the case going to the Supreme Court.