Teismų praktika

  • Bylos aprašymas
    • Nacionalinis numeris: Supreme Administrative Court , Judgement eA-140-822/2020
    • Valstybė narė: Lietuva
    • Bendrinis pavadinimas:N/A
    • Sprendimo rūšis: Administracinis sprendimas apeliacinėje byloje
    • Sprendimo data: 17/02/2020
    • Teismas: Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas
    • Tema:
    • Ieškovas:
    • Atsakovas:
    • Raktažodžiai: misleading advertising
  • Direktyvos straipsniai
    Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive, Article 2, (b) Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive, Article 3 Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive, Article 3
  • Įžanginė pastaba

    An advertisement where a real estate object is advertised as residential, but is actually for non-residential purposes, should be regarded as misleading.

  • Faktai

    Competition Council of Lithuania fined UAB “Kauno būstai” for advertising a real estate object as residential, even though they were of non-residential purpose. The company appealed the Competition Council’s ruling. The First Instance Court dismissed the action.

  • Teisės klausimas

    Should an advertisement where a real estate object was advertised as residential, but was actually of non-residential purpose, be regarded as misleading?

  • Sprendimas

    Since the applicant advertised the real estate objects as residential, she was obliged under Article 5, paragraph 2, part 1 of the Law on Advertising to substantiate the accuracy of these statements during the use of the advertisement. The panel of judges agrees with the assessment of the Council and the Court of First Instance that the incorrect information provided in the advertisements about the sale of residential immovable property was misleading, as it could have influenced the economic behaviour of consumers.

    URL: https://eteismai.lt/byla/196884054672818/eA-140-822/2020?word=asmenin%C4%97%20nuosavyb%C4%97%20reikalingas%20kito%20sutuoktinio%20ra%C5%A1ytinis%20sutikimas

    Visas tekstas: Visas tekstas

  • Susijusios bylos

    Rezultatų nėra

  • Teisinė literatūra

    Rezultatų nėra

  • Rezultatas

    The Court left the decision of the First Instance Court unchanged.