Euroopa e-õiguskeskkonna portaal - Kohtupraktika
Sulge

PORTAALI BEETAVERSIOON ON NÜÜD KÄTTESAADAV!

Külastage Euroopa e-õiguskeskkonna portaali beetaversiooni ja andke meile selle kohta tagasisidet!

 
 

Navigatsioonitee


menu starting dummy link

Page navigation

menu starting dummy link

et_Case Details

et_Case Details
et_National ID 3-2-1-11-2010
Liikmesriik Eesti
et_Common Name Artur Melnitsenko v. VARIETAS Ltd
et_Decision type Muu
et_Decision date 30/03/2010
Kohus Riigikohus
Teema
Hageja
Kostja
Võtmesõnad

Consumer Sales and Guarantees Directive, Article 3, 5.

The case concerns art. 3(5) of the Directive 99/44 and § 223 of the Law of Obligations Act.
Art. 3 (5) of The Directive 99/44 states that the consumer may require an appropriate reduction of the price or have the contract rescinded:
- if the seller has not completed the remedy within a reasonable time.
Also § 223 of the Law of Obligations Act states that the buyer may have the contract rescinded if the seller has not completed the remedy within a reasonable time (this is considered as a significant violation of the contract).
et_Full text: et_Full text

et_No results available

et_No results available