Case law

  • Case Details
    • National ID: 5 0 68/09
    • Member State: Germany
    • Common Name:link
    • Decision type: Court decision, first degree
    • Decision date: 14/07/2009
    • Court: Regional Court (Itzehoe)
    • Subject:
    • Plaintiff: not disclosed
    • Defendant: gas supplier - name not disclosed
    • Keywords: comparative advertising, omission, price comparison, price information
  • Directive Articles
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Article 5, 1.
  • Headnote
    It is an unfair commercial practice to publish an advertisement that compares gas prices with the prices of the primary local supplier, without mentioning the effective total price, and without mentioning that the price is subject to further requirements.
  • Facts
    A gas supply company compared its prices with the prices of the primary local supplier in a daily newspaper, without mentioning the effective total price, and without mentioning that the advertised price was subject to the following requirements: (1) the advertised price required a minimum contract term of one year; (2) the commitment to a price category was chosen at the time of conclusion of the contract, for a period of one year; and (3) payment through direct debit.

    The plaintiff requested injunctive relief against this commercial practice.
  • Legal issue
    Such advertisement violates §§ 3 I, 4 No. 11 UWG (the German Unfair Competition Act) in connection with § 3 PAngV (the German ordinance on price statements), because § 3 PAngV requires gas suppliers to mention the total price -- including taxes -- in advertisements directed at consumers.
  • Decision

    Is a comparative advertisement unfair if it does not mention the effective total price and does not mention the applicable conditions to receive the advertised price? 

    Full text: Full text

  • Related Cases

    No results available

  • Legal Literature

    No results available

  • Result
    The plaintiff's request was granted.