Defendant overcharged plaintiff when she had signed a contract stipulating "unlimited" access in the tariff plan.
The court acknowledged the fact that the word "unlimited" was found in writing (inserted by hand into the contract under the title "Tariff Plan").
The plaintiff made express reference to Articles 51A to 51J to Part VII of the Consumer Affairs Act, which renders a commercial practice misleading if it in any way, including its overall presentation, deceives or is likely to deceive the average consumer or is likely to cause him to take a transactional decision that he would not have taken otherwise.