In its decision, CRPC found that by using almost unreadable characters to give material information, the defendant did not comply with its duty to include material information in the advertisement and, therefore, omitted material information and performed a misleading commercial practice.
CRPC also substantiated its view by referring to previous cases of the District Court of Administrative Cases, which had established that advertisements using excessively small characters and in which information is provided that is not perceptible well enough and is not clearly understandable, are to be considered deficient and therefore inconsistent with provisions of the law.
URL: http://www.ptac.gov.lv/upload/ptac_lemumi/2011/lemums_nr-e03-kreud-11_sia_lattelecom_izraksts.pdf
Pilns teksts: Pilns teksts