Portal Ewropew Ġustizzja-e - Ġurisprudenza
Agħlaq

IL-VERŻJONI BETA TAL-PORTAL ISSA HI DISPONIBBLI!

Żur il-verżjoni BETA tal-Portal Ewropew tal-Ġustizzja Elettronika u agħtina l-feedback dwar l-esperjenza tiegħek!

 
 

Mogħdija tan-navigazzjoni


menu starting dummy link

Page navigation

menu starting dummy link

Dettalji tal-Każ

Dettalji tal-Każ
ID Nazzjonali CCT 354/09 Joseph Cassar v George Barbara
Stat Membru Malta
Isem Komuni link
Tip ta’ deċiżjoni Deċiżjoni tal-qorti, l-ewwel grad
Data tad-Deċiżjoni 05/07/2010
Qorti Maltese Consumer Tribunal
Suġġett
Rikorrent Joseph Cassar
Intimat George Barbara
Kliem Prinċipali material information, product characteristics

Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 7, 1.

Not providing information on the quality of a product constitutes a misleading omission.
The plaintiff had purchased an engine of the defendant.

After a period of time, the engine established some defects, for which the defendant was held liable.

According to the plaintiff, the defendant had not informed the plaintiff on the quality of the product.

 
Does it constitute a misleading omission not to provide information on the quality of a product?
In a short reasoning, it was held by the court that the information on the quality of a product is essential information.

Next, the defendant could not prove such information was communicated to the plaintiff.

As a result, according to the court, the plaintiff had not been provided with all relevant information in order to make an informed transactional decision. Hence, the defendant had breached the prohibition on misleading omissions.
Test sħiħ: Test sħiħ

Ebda riżultat disponibbli

Ebda riżultat disponibbli

The Tribunal ordered the vendor to pay damages.