The plaintiff acted as an agent for, hence promotes the services of, ING Bank.
It was established that, when the plaintiff communicated business hours at its office, it primarily referred to the office hours of ING Bank rather than to its own business hours.
Further, the ING logo was depicted outside of the office of the plaintiff, and inside the office, the agent promoted its services by providing ING flyers containing information on the services offered by ING.
Next, plaintiff's employees wore ING badges and some of them introduced themselves as being ING employees.
It was established that it was unclear for a consumer to release that he was in fact dealing with an agent only, rather than with an ING Bank branch.