The Italian Competition Authority stated that the commercial communication and advertisements circulated by defendant, using the wording "Zero Impact", constituted "environmental claims" or "green claims", since they suggested that the company's bottles of water were environment friendly (i.e. had no impact on the environment).
However, the defendant used the "Zero Impact" notion in a misleading way, the court held, thus creating the wrong impression that its products were less damaging to the environment than competing goods. In particular, as it emerged from the Authority's investigations, the defendant was not actively involved in specific activities reducing the impact of its products on the environment (e.g. decreasing CO2 production), but it simply participated in a project promoted by a third party providing for economic contribution to compensate environmental damages.
Based on the above considerations, the Italian Competition Authority concluded that the "Zero Impact" campaign constituted an unfair commercial practice, capable of influencing consumers' transactional decisions.
URL: http://www.agcm.it/consumatore/consumatore-delibere/open/C12560D000291394/2B66AD5274E26730C12579B2003AE458.html
Testo integrale: Testo integrale