Case law

  • Case Details
    • National ID: J.nr.: 11/02116
    • Member State: Denmark
    • Common Name:J.nr.: 11/02116
    • Decision type: Other
    • Decision date: 12/01/2012
    • Court: The Danish Consumer Ombudsman
    • Subject:
    • Plaintiff: Forbrugerombudsmanden (the Danish Consumer Ombudsman)
    • Defendant: Stofa A/S
    • Keywords: free, material information, misleading advertising, misleading omissions, precontractual information, price, price information
  • Directive Articles
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 6, 1., (d) Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 7, 1.
  • Headnote
    Marketing subscription service as being without charges, whereas in reality the trader charges the consumer a certain cost for setting up the service constitutes a misleading commercial practice.
  • Facts
    The defendant marketed his mobile phone subscription as being without charges. When consumers bought the mobile phone subscription, however, the trader charged them DKK 99 (approx. EUR 13) for setting up the subscription plan.
  • Legal issue
    According to the Danish Consumer Ombudsman it was a misleading advertising practice to market mobile phone subscriptions as being without charges when the trader charged consumers for setting up the subscription plan.
  • Decision

    Does it constitute a misleading commercial practice to market a subscription service as being without charges, whereas in reality the trader charges the consumer a certain cost for setting up the service?

    Full text: Full text

  • Related Cases

    No results available

  • Legal Literature

    No results available

  • Result
    The defendant was fined DKK 200,000 (approx. EUR 26,800).