Giurisprudenza

  • Dettagli del caso
    • ID nazionale: PS10042 - Decision No. 25759
    • Stato membro: Italia
    • Nome comune:H3G - Sweep garanzia legale / commerciale
    • Tipo di decisione: Altro
    • Data della decisione: 02/12/2015
    • Organo giurisdizionale: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Rome)
    • Oggetto:
    • Attore: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Rome)
    • Convenuto: H3G S.p.A. and TMM S.r.l.
    • Parole chiave: distance contracting, guarantee, information obligation, off-premises contract
  • Articoli della direttiva
    Consumer Rights Directive, Chapter 3, Article 6 Consumer Rights Directive, Chapter 3, Article 8, 1.
  • Nota introduttiva
    In the context of distance contracts, the lack of clear mandatory pre-contractual information as well as of a complete memo on the scope and types of the exercise of the legal guarantee of conformity for goods constitutes an unfair commercial practice since it is an infringement of Articles 6 and 8, Paragraph 1 of Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights.
  • Fatti
    The Italian Competition Authority launched an investigation against the defendants with regard to the diffusion, through the webpages www.tre.it, www.3store.tre.it and www.checkout3.it of omissive information with reference to consumers' rights and, in particular, to the mandatory pre-contractual information as well as to the legal guarantee of conformity for goods.
    In order to finalize the online purchase of H3G-branded electronic devices, the consumer was re-directed from H3G webpages placed under the sub-domain www.tre.it to the domain www.checkout3.it, which was structured as an e-commerce platform, whose holder was TMM S.r.l.
    The investigation carried out by the plaintiff revealed that TMM S.r.l. was an authorized reseller of H3G-branded products and services. As a result, TMM S.r.l. was the consumer's counterparty at the time of sale, while H3G S.p.A. was in charge of the warranty service and of the management of the potential right of withdrawal of the consumer.
    Moreover, since such commercial practice had been spread through means of telecommunication, on 3 November 2015 the ICA requested the opinion of the Italian Communications Authority, pursuant to Article 27, Paragraph 6 of the Italian Consumer Code, whose results have been as follows:

    (1) Internet is a global communications network, which may offer instantly to users a wide range of potential information likely to influence their behavior;

    (2) Internet has become the third means of mass communication for penetration (after television and radio), with 64% of Italian families who can access it from home and 34.1% of people over 14 years old who have used it to sort and / or buy goods and / or services for private use;

    (3) Internet allows a more accurate user profiling, on which one may base the ability to reach specific target of consumers, by sending them targeted messages, with increasing levels of personalization;

    (4) consumers, convinced by the direct consultation of a website in order to examine the offers related to their potential purchases, might then actually benefit from the professional performance and adhere to the purchase of the products offered for sale, regardless of the basic pre-contractual information to make an informed transactional decision thus developing concretely the full promotional potential of online communications.

    The ICA concluded that the repartition of roles and responsibilities towards consumer was not clearly identifiable from the information provided. Moreover, there was no references to the existence of the legal guarantee, since the relevant notice was only indicated, in incomplete and generic terms, after the finalization of the purchase by the consumer.
  • Questione giuridica
    Does the lack of clear mandatory pre-contractual information as well as of a complete memo on the scope and types of the exercise of the legal guarantee of conformity for goods constitute an unfair commercial practice?
  • Decisione

    The plaintiff held that the defendants had jointly infringed the provision of Articles 49 and 51, Paragraph 1 of the Italian Consumer Code about the information requirements for distance and off premises contracts and on the legal guarantee for goods. In particular, in order to evaluate the gravity of the practice carried out by the defendants, the plaintiff considered the circumstance that consumers made online purchases, hence through a tool which is highly persuasive and capable of influencing the behavior of thousands of people.

    URL: http://www.agcm.it/consumatore--delibere/consumatore-provvedimenti/open/C12560D000291394/82A249D9C2214F7EC1257F290061EFD4.html

    Testo integrale: Testo integrale

  • Casi correlati

    Nessun risultato disponibile

  • Dottrina

    Nessun risultato disponibile

  • Risultato
    On the basis of the gravity and duration of the practice carried out by the defendants, the ICA held that the defendant's conduct constituted an infringement of Articles 6 and 8, Paragraph 1 of Directive 2011/83/EU and ordered the defendant to cease the unfair commercial practice and sanctioned (i) H3G S.p.A. with a fine of € 100,000.00 and (ii) TMM S.r.l. with a fine of € 10,000.00 in consideration of the subjective and objective conditions of the parties.