Jurisprudence

  • Informations concernant l’affaire
    • ID national: 12-27927
    • État membre: France
    • Nom commun:N/A
    • Type de décision: Décision de la Cour suprême
    • Date de la décision: 05/02/2014
    • Juridiction: Cour de Cassation
    • Objet:
    • Demandeur: Unknown
    • Défendeur: Lapeyre
    • Mots clés: conformity with the contract, goods
  • Articles de la directive
    Consumer Sales and Guarantees Directive, Article 2, 2., (c)
  • Note introductive
    Non-conformity is assessed on the basis of the purpose usually associated with a good.
  • Faits
    The plaintiff bought a shower panel from the defendant, but later asked for refund or a replacement arguing the good was not conform to the contract, notably invoking a specific norm to support its claim. The Court of Appeals rejected the claim, noting that the invoked norm was not mandatary, therefore considered the good was conform to the contract.
  • Question juridique
    Can a non-mandatory norm be taken into acount to determine conformity of the good to the contract?
  • Décision

    The Supreme Court rejected the Court of appeals solution, noting that non-conformity should be assessed on the basis of the purpose usually associated with a good, not on the basis of a general consideration.

    URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?idTexte=JURITEXT000028576031

    Texte intégral: Texte intégral

  • Affaires liées

    Aucun résultat disponible

  • Doctrine

    Aucun résultat disponible

  • Résultat
    Court of Appeals decicion partly overturned.