Portalul european e-justiție - Case Law
Închide

VERSIUNEA BETA A PORTALULUI ESTE ACUM DISPONIBILĂ!

Accesați versiunea BETA a portalului european e-justiție și spuneți-ne cum vi se pare!

 
 

Cale de navigare


menu starting dummy link

Page navigation

menu starting dummy link

Case Details

Case Details
National ID Decision no. 1348/2014
Statul membru România
Common Name link
Decision type Court decision in appeal
Decision date 13/11/2014
Instanţa Tribunalul București
Obiect
Reclamantul Unknown
Pârâtul Unknown
Cuvinte-cheie guarantee, proof of damage

Consumer Sales and Guarantees Directive, Article 3, 1. Consumer Sales and Guarantees Directive, Article 5, 3.

(1) Directive 1999/44/EEC (implemented into Romanian law by the provisions of Law no. 449/2003 on the sale of goods and associated guarantees) establishes a legal presumption in favor of consumers, meaning that until proven otherwise, the lack of conformity which becomes apparent within 6 months from the delivery of the product is presumed to have existed at the time of its delivery.
(2) In analyzing the conformity of the product, the court takes into account its purchase price.
The plaintiff was sanctioned with a warning for committing the offence provided by Directive 1999/44/EEC, for lack of conformity of products at the time they were delivered and requested the annulment of the minutes ascertaining the sanction.
(1) Does Directive 1999/44/EEC establish a legal presumption in favor of consumers that the lack of conformity of a product existed at the time of its delivery, if the lack of conformity becomes apparent within 6 months from the delivery of the product ?
(2) Does the court take into account the purchase price, when analyzing the conformity of the product ?
Given the very short time from the purchase of the products to the moment the damage occurred, there is an obvious lack of conformity of products that existed at the date of delivery, meaning that the products delivered did not correspond to the purposes for which products of the same type are normally used and to quality parameters to which the consumer can reasonably expect, no consumer expecting footwear products to deteriorate only after one wearing, 3 days after purchasing it.
In analyzing the conformity of the product, the court took into account its purchase price. For an expensive product, the consumer can expect some quality parameters, while for a lower price, the consumer can expect lower quality parameters. In these circumstances, the consumer can reasonably expect to a raise in the quality parameters and not to a deterioration of products in the first days from purchase.
Full Text: Full Text

No results available

No results available

The plaintiff`s appeal was rejected.