Case Details


Case Details
National ID C.08.0482.N
État membre Belgique
Common Name link
Decision type Supreme court decision
Decision date 21/01/2010
Juridiction Hof van Cassatie
Objet
Demandeur D.T.
Défendeur Q.G. and M.T.
Mots clés

Consumer Sales and Guarantees Directive, Article 2 Consumer Sales and Guarantees Directive, Article 3, 2.

(1) A seller, as defined under article 1(2)(c) of the Directive 1999/44 (implemented into Belgian law by article 1649bis, §2, 2° of the Civil Code) refers to every natural or legal person who sustainably engages in economic activity, excluding any person who does not act in a professional capacity.

(2) Someone who breeds animals as a hobby is not a 'seller' under Article 1(2)(c) Directive 1999/44 (implemented into Belgian law by article 1649bis, §2, 2° of the Civil Code).
The case concerned the purchase of a dog by the defendants from the plaintiff. Shortly after the dog was delivered to the defendants, it died.

The defendants made a claim against the plaintiff on the grounds of the dog having been afflicted with a hidden defect. As a result of this claim, and based on the principle stipulated in article 3(2) of Directive 1999/44 (implemented into Belgian law by article 1649quinquies of the Civil Code) that where a good is afflicted with a hidden defect, the consumer is entitled to reparation, the cantonal court of Lokeren held that a dog which plaintiff sold to the defendant, and which died shortly after it was delivered to defendant, was afflicted with a hidden defect and that plaintiff was thereby due compensation to defendant.
1) To which persons does the notion "seller", as defined in Article 1(2)(c) Directive 1999/44 (implemented into Belgian law by article 1649bis, §2, 2° of the Civil Code) refer and who is excluded from its scope of application?

(2) Should someone who breeds animals as a hobby be considered a "seller" under article 1(2)(c) Directive 1999/44?
The court set aside the judgment of the cantonal court by stating that the rules on consumer protection regarding sale of consumer goods are only applicable in sales emanating from a seller to a consumer. The court found that plaintiff did not fall within the definition of 'seller'.
Full Text: Full Text

No results available

No results available

The court set aside the judgment of the cantonal court and referred to the cantonal court of Sint-Niklaas.