The court imposes the defendant, under the penalty of a fine, to state the cost for the directory enquiries service when providing the service by telephone and text message to consumers, if the consumer requests it. The price information shall then be given after the consumer has made a directory enquiry, but before the defendant replies to the enquiry, and shall be clear and understandable.
The court firstly states that the defendant provides price information on its website and in advertising, however not when a consumer wishes to purchase the service and contacts the defendant by phone. It is clear that the consumers which are contacting the defendant understands that a fee will be charged for each phone call or text message. However, the consumer will not be able to fully view all prices that are applied by the defendant from time to other, especially if the defendant's different services are subject to different fees. Considering that the fees for the service are not insignificant, the court finds that it is of importance that price information is provided in such manner that the consumers practically can receive such information.
The court states that it is generally known that directory enquires services often are used in situations when there are no other, or very limited ways of obtaining the requested information. Thus, the fact that price information is provided on the defendant's website is not sufficient to fulfil the consumer's need to receive such information. The court finds that the price information must be provided after the consumer has made a directory enquiry, but before the defendant replies to the enquiry, in order to fulfil the consumer's need for such information.
Price information shall be given when providing a service to the customer. The stated omission to provide price information is considered misleading advertising and constitutes unfair marketing practices.
URL: http://www.marknadsdomstolen.se/Filer/Avgöranden/Dom2016-1.pdf
Hela texten: Hela texten