Case law

  • Case Details
    • National ID: V.L.D. 11. januar 2013 i anke 14. afd. B-2567-12
    • Member State: Denmark
    • Common Name:link
    • Decision type: Court decision in appeal
    • Decision date: 11/01/2013
    • Court: Western High Court
    • Subject:
    • Plaintiff: At Work A/S
    • Defendant: Unknown
    • Keywords: enforcement, illness, risk, unfair terms
  • Directive Articles
    Unfair Contract Terms Directive, Article 6, 1.
  • Headnote
    A contract cannot be set aside on the grounds of subsequent illness and it is not unfair to enforce the contract.
  • Facts
    In January 2011, the defendant developed a blood clot in the brainstem and was on sick leave until May or June that year where she resumed work. In July 2011, the defendant signed up for an online course. In August 2011, the defendant told her employer that she was unfit for work and was consequently fired the following month. As the defendant's medical condition made reading unendurable, she attempted to get participation in the online course postponed. However, the defendant's request was denied at which point she ceased all payments.
  • Legal issue
    The court stated that it was not unfair to enforce the contract despite the defendant's illness and that it was not reasonable to let one party bear the risk of the other party falling ill.
  • Decision

    Can a contract be set aside on the grounds of subsequent illness and is it unfair to enforce it under those circumstances?

    Full text: Full text

  • Related Cases

    No results available

  • Legal Literature

    No results available

  • Result
    The plaintiff's claim was sustained.