(1) An advertisement in which a competitor is named, in which it is alleged that the consumer will always pay less with the advertiser, and which invites the consumer to send the invoice of the competitor to calculate the savings they could realize when switching provider, constitutes a comparative advertisement.
(2) A comparative advertising campaign, which alleges that consumers can always and under any conditions, obtain a price advantage, whereas this is not proven in reality, constitutes a misleading and therefore unlawful comparative advertising campaign.