The court considered that consumers have an obligation to act diligently and acquire all the available information about a service they are purchasing. Furthermore, the court found that the plaintiffs were aware of Terms of Use of the defendant’s website which clearly indicated that the defendant acts as a retailer.
Thus, despite the defendant being registered also as an organizer, the court relied on the Terms of Use in finding that the defendant is a retailer. Since the law prescribed liability for the failure to perform contracts only to organizers, the court found that the defendant cannot be held liable.
URL: https://manas.tiesas.lv/eTiesasMvc/nolemumi/pdf/289165.pdf
Pilns teksts: Pilns teksts