The concept of consumer in the provision of Article 1 of Law 2251/1994, which attempted to incorporate the substantive provisions of Community law for Consumer protection is different and wider than that of Article 13 of the Lugano and Brussels Conventions. This definition does not include those who acquire goods to transfer them or to give up their use or to use on behalf of third parties, and includes the one who acquires the product as an end-user even when using it for his / her business needs. However, the intention of the national legislator to extend the concept of consumer, as it is understood and protected by the respective directives, in particular by Directive 85/577 / EEC on consumer protection in the conclusion of contracts negotiated away from business premises, 87/102 (as amended by 90/88 / EU) on "Consumer Credit" and 99/44 / EC on "Aspects of the Sale of Consumer Goods", which is identical to the above concept of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions. It is clear that the above Law endeavors to enlarge the concept of consumer beyond the protection threshold of the Brussels Convention and Community law (that is to say, the party considers the "consumer" and the professional trader or professional end-user in the preceding analysis) reflects only national law and, to that end, the protection granted to such a "consumer" can not prevail, in accordance with Article 28 of the Constitution, the rules of the Lugano or New York Convention. Therefore, only contracts concluded to meet the private consumption needs of a person at a private level fall within the provisions protecting the consumer as a financially weaker party. The special protection sought by those provisions is not justified in the case of contracts which are intended for professional activity and when the trade attempted by traders and freelancers is functionally linked to the exercise of their profession, there is no question of their protection under the envisaged regulations.