Giurisprudenza

  • Dettagli del caso
    • ID nazionale: 10739
    • Stato membro: Italia
    • Nome comune:M.V. e altro c. Banca Piacenza
    • Tipo di decisione: Altro
    • Data della decisione: 27/09/2006
    • Organo giurisdizionale: Tribunale
    • Oggetto:
    • Attore:
    • Convenuto:
    • Parole chiave:
  • Articoli della direttiva
    Unfair Contract Terms Directive, Article 2 Unfair Contract Terms Directive, Article 3, 1. Unfair Contract Terms Directive, Article 4, 1. Unfair Contract Terms Directive, ANNEX I, 1.
  • Nota introduttiva
    A clause establishing a jurisdiction different from those of the judge where the consumer is resident or domiciled should be considered unfair. This applies also to the consumer contracts concerning investments services.
  • Fatti
    Not available.
  • Questione giuridica
  • Decisione

    The Tribunal of Milan confirmed the interpretation of the art. 33, paragraph 2, letter u, of the Consumer Code on the jurisdiction in consumers’ contracts rendered by the Sezioni Unite of the Corte di cassazione in the judgment no. 14669/2003.
    At to the Tribunal of Milan, a clause establishing a jurisdiction different from those of the judge where the consumer is resident or domiciled should be considered unfair.
    It is interesting to note that this interpretation also applies to the consumer contract concerning investment services.

    Testo integrale: Testo integrale

  • Casi correlati

    Nessun risultato disponibile

  • Dottrina

    Nessun risultato disponibile

  • Risultato