Teismų praktika

  • Bylos aprašymas
    • Nacionalinis numeris: 2S-22
    • Valstybė narė: Lietuva
    • Bendrinis pavadinimas:N/A
    • Sprendimo rūšis: Administracinis sprendimas, pirmoji instancija
    • Sprendimo data: 22/10/2009
    • Teismas: Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (Vilnius)
    • Tema:
    • Ieškovas:
    • Atsakovas: UAB “Teisingumas”
    • Raktažodžiai: black list, economic behaviour, endorsement, material distortion, misleading advertising, misleading commercial practices, regulated profession
  • Direktyvos straipsniai
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 1, Article 2, (d) Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Annex I, 1. Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Annex I, 4.
  • Įžanginė pastaba
    Advertising services for which a license is required, whereas in reality the trader is not authorised under applicable law to provide such services, constitutes a false claim that a trader has been approved/authorised.
  • Faktai
    In the course of providing legal services, the defendant advertised its services offered using wording such as “Justice – attorney (…) services “.

    The defendant was not authorised to provide attorney services under applicable law.
  • Teisės klausimas
    Does the advertising of services for which a license is required, whereas in reality the trader is not authorised under applicable laws to provide such services, constitute a false claim that a trader has been approved/authorised?
  • Sprendimas

    The Council referred to the prohibition to falsely claim that a trader (including his commercial practices) has been licensed (authorised).

    The Council drew attention to the fact that the defendant was not authorized under applicable law to provide attorney services, neither did he have any agreements with law firms, authorised to provide the services involved.

    URL: http://www.konkuren.lt/index.php?show=nut_view&nut_id=1081

    Visas tekstas: Visas tekstas

  • Susijusios bylos

    Rezultatų nėra

  • Teisinė literatūra

    Rezultatų nėra

  • Rezultatas
    A number of the defendant’s advertising statements were concluded to be an unfair commercial practice and a misleading advertising. A fine of LTL 2,800 (approx. EUR 800) was imposed on the defendant.