• Detalii privind cazul
    • ID național: County Court, Gorj, Judgment 313/2017
    • Statul membru: România
    • Denumire comună:N/A
    • Tipul de decizie: Decizie a Curții care face obiectul unui recurs
    • Data deciziei: 24/04/2017
    • Instanţa: County Court, Gorj
    • Obiect:
    • Reclamantul:
    • Pârâtul:
    • Cuvinte-cheie: consumer, definiton, scope
  • Articole din directivă
    Consumer Rights Directive, Chapter 1, Article 2 Consumer Rights Directive, Chapter 1, Article 2, (1) Consumer Rights Directive, Chapter 1, Article 3 Consumer Rights Directive, Chapter 1, Article 3, 1.
  • Notă preliminară


    A territorial administrative unit cannot be considered as a consumer in the sense of the Government Emergency Ordinance (GEO); this status can be attributed only to natural persons.

  • Fapte

    Software purchase agreement between a territorial administrative unit (UAT) and a private company. When the company had already executed part of its obligations, the UAT, unilaterally, terminated the contract and refused to pay.

    The UAT defended itself by invoking Law OUG 34/2014.

  • Chestiune juridică

    Who can be qualified as a “consumer”?

    Scope of application of the OUG 34/2014

  • Hotărârea
  • Cazuri conexe

    Nu există rezultate disponibile

  • Doctrină

    Nu există rezultate disponibile

  • Rezultat

    First Instance:

    The UAT is obliged to pay the pending invoices and the pertinent contractual sanctions, based on the breach of the contract.

    Appeal grounds:

    The plaintiff claims that the Court had incorrectly applied the legal provisions of Law OUG 34/2014.