Judikatura

  • Podrobnosti případu
    • Národní identifikační číslo: Constitutional Court, Judgment no. IV. ÚS 3092/16-2
    • členský stát: Česko
    • Obecný název:N/A
    • Typ rozhodnutí: Rozhodnutí Soudního dvora
    • Datum vydání rozhodnutí: 18/07/2017
    • Soud: Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic
    • Předmět:
    • Žalobce:
    • Žalovaný:
    • Klíčová slova: consumers, insurance limit, travel package
  • Články směrnice
    Package Travel Directive, Article 4, 5. Package Travel Directive, Article 4, 5., - Package Travel Directive, Article 4, 5., - Package Travel Directive, Article 4, 5.
  • Úvodní poznámka

    Insurance benefit limit based on an insurance contract between a travel agency and an insurance company.

  • Skutkový stav
    N/A
  • Právní otázky

    As customers, each of the plaintiffs entered into a travel contract with the travel agent, in which the travel agency was to provide them with a trip to Turkey on the specified date. The plaintiffs paid a deposit of 50% of the total price of a tour, which did not take place due to the bankruptcy of the travel agency. From the insolvency insurance of the travel agency, the defendant provided each of the plaintiffs indemnification of up to 5.4% of the advance payment (deposit), claiming that they could not cover the damages of the travel agency's clients above the limit of the insurance limit agreed in the insurance contract.

  • Rozhodnutí

    When assessing a consumer's claim arising from a special legal regulation of the insurance of guarantees in the event of a travel agency's bankruptcy, it is not possible to use the limit of insurance benefits, as the private law arrangement between two business entities cannot lead to the exclusion or limitation of the consumer's statutory claims, as he has no possibility to influence this private arrangement.

    URL: https://nalus.usoud.cz/Search/ResultDetail.aspx?id=98408&pos=1&cnt=3&typ=result

    Úplné znění: Úplné znění

  • Související případy

    Výsledky nejsou k dispozici.

  • Právní nauka

    Výsledky nejsou k dispozici.

  • Výsledek
    N/A