The court ruled that all the statements were misleading and constituted undue marketing as they were inexact and too one-sided. Thus, so the court held, the statements violated Sections 1 and 3 of the Danish Marketing Practices Act.
With respect to the statement about the plaintiff’s products, the court found that it violated Sections 5 of the Danish Marketing Practices Act and therefore it was an illegal comparative advertisement.
Hele teksten: Hele teksten