Defensor Legis 6/2012, page 895
|
A comment regarding Professor Björn Sandvik’s article about the so-called time assumption regulation in chapter 5 section 15 subsection 2 of the Consumer Protection Act |
STÅHLBERG, P. |
2012
|
Talentum Pro, 1. painos, 2015
|
Consumer Protection Law |
PELTONEN, A., MÄÄTTÄ, K. |
2015
|
Defensor Legis 2012/4, page 566.
|
Incorrectly about defect in the Consumer Disputes Board’s decision practice – a short commentary about the relation between the Consumer Protection Act’s defect assumption rule and the guarantee rule |
SANDVIK, B. |
2012
|
Defensor Legis 1/2013, page 102
|
More about the defect assumption in the Consumer Disputes Board’s incorrect decision practice – reply to chairman Pauli Ståhlberg’s comment in consequence of my article |
SANDVIK, B. |
2013
|