Online case law databases
Judgments made by Austrian courts are published in the legal information system of the Republic of Austria and can be found at http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/. Judgments by the highest courts and the administrative courts are published in full; those of the other courts are published only in some individual cases.
The legal information system (Rechtsinformationssystem – RIS) is an electronic database operated by the Austrian Federal Chancellery. Its main purpose is to announce legislation published in the Austrian federal law gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) and provide information about the law in the Federal Republic of Austria.
The RIS offers good web accessibility (WAI-AA in accordance with WCAG 2.0).
Presentation of decisions / headlines
Supreme courts |
Other courts |
|
Case law presented with headlines |
Yes |
Partially |
Examples of headline/s:
Serial number RS0127077
Reference number 11 Os 87/11w
Date of judgment 25.8.2011
Text of the headline
Generally a headline is composed of the following elements: number of the division: 11, procedure type reference: Os, running number: 87, and year: 11. Then the date of judgment is added: 25.8.2011.
European Case Law Identifier (ECLI)
The European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) can be found under this heading. It is a unique identifier for court judgments within the EU Member States.
Formats
Judgments are available in the following formats: XML, RTF, PDF and HTML.
Courts and other institutions concerned
Supreme courts
- Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof)
- Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof)
- Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof)
Courts and other institutions
- Higher regional courts (Oberlandesgerichte) and other courts (civil and criminal cases)
- Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht)
- Regional Administrative Courts (Landesverwaltungsgerichte)
- Federal Finance Court (Bundesfinanzgericht, external)
- Data Protection Authority (Datenschutzbehörde) (prior to 2014: Data Protection Commission (Datenschutzkommission))
- Disciplinary Commissions (Disziplinarkommissionen), Supreme Disciplinary Commission (Disziplinaroberkommission), Appeals Tribunal (Berufungskommission)
- Supervisory Authority for Employee Representation (Personalvertretungsaufsichtsbehörde) (prior to 2014: Supervisory Commission for Employee Representation (Personalvertretungs-Aufsichtskommission)
- Equal Treatment Commissions (Gleichbehandlungskommissionen) from 2014
- Equal Treatment Commissions (Gleichbehandlungskommissionen) from 2008 (external)
- Independent Administrative Tribunals (unabhängige Verwaltungssenate) – selected rulings from 1991 to 2013, then Regional Administrative Courts
- Financial documentation, Independent Finance Tribunal (unabhängiger Finanzsenat) (external; rulings until 2013, then Federal Finance Court)
- Independent Federal Asylum Tribunal (unabhängiger Bundesasylsenat) (selected rulings from 1998 to 2008)
- Asylum Tribunal (Asylgerichtshof) (rulings from July 2008 to 2013, then Federal Administrative Court)
- Environmental Tribunal (Umweltsenat) (selected rulings from 1994 to 2013, then Federal Administrative Court)
- Federal Communications Board (Bundeskommunikationsenat) (selected rulings from 2001 to 2013, then Federal Administrative Court)
- Public Procurement Review Authorities (selected decisions up to 2013, then Federal Administrative Court)
Note: Not all the answers below are applicable to all the above courts and tribunals
Further proceedings
Supreme courts |
Other courts |
|
Is information available on:
|
No |
No |
|
No |
No |
|
No |
Yes, providing the rulings by the highest courts are published |
|
Only irrevocable judgments are published. |
Only irrevocable judgments are published. |
|
Yes Yes Yes |
No No No |
Publication Rules
At national level? |
At the level of courts? |
|
Are there binding rules for the publication of judgments? |
Yes |
Yes |
Sections 15 and 15a of the Supreme Court Act (OGH Act), Section 48a of the Court Organisation Act (GOG), Section 23 of the Federal Finance Court Act (BFGG), Section 20 of the Federal Administrative Court Act (BVwGG)
Supreme courts |
Other courts |
|
Are all judgments published or only a selection? |
With few exceptions |
Only a small selection in the case of the ordinary courts; extensively in the case of the administrative courts |
If a selection is made, what criteria are applied? |
Judgments are published in full together with a summary. Supreme Court judgments which reject an appeal without substantial reasoning are not published. |
Judgments are published in full together with a summary. Judgments by other courts are published if their significance extends beyond the individual case. |
The national language version of this page is maintained by the respective Member State. The translations have been done by the European Commission service. Possible changes introduced in the original by the competent national authority may not be yet reflected in the translations. The European Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any information or data contained or referred to in this document. Please refer to the legal notice to see copyright rules for the Member State responsible for this page.