Cooperation in civil matters
Judicial cooperation in civil matters exists between EU countries in order to improve interoperability between their judicial systems
Judicial cooperation in civil matters aims to establish close cooperation between the authorities of the Member States in order to eliminate any obstacles deriving from incompatibilities between the various legal and administrative systems.
Initially governed by international conventions, judicial cooperation in civil matters was included in the Maastricht Treaty as a 'matter of common interest', and subsequently in the Treaty of Amsterdam (1997), which places judicial cooperation in civil matters at Community level by associating it with the free movement of persons.
The European Council held in its 1999 Tampere conclusions that “in a genuine European area of justice individuals and businesses should not be prevented or discouraged from exercising their rights by the incompatibility or complexity of legal and administrative systems in the Member States”. This confirmed their commitment to establishing a genuine area of justice “where people can approach courts and authorities in any Member State as easily as in their own”. This has been reconfirmed in the 2004 Hague Programme in order to strengthen justice as well as by the European Commission in the so- called 2009 Stockholm Programme.
The principle of mutual recognition is the cornerstone of judicial cooperation. The goal is that judicial decisions should be recognised and enforced in another Member State without any additional intermediate step, in other words, suppression of exequatur.
Please consult relevant subpages to find more information on:
- Croatia - cooperation in civil matters
- Taking of evidence
- Service of documents
- Interim and precautionary measures
- Procedural time limits
- Automatic processing
- Enforcement of judgments
- the European Payment Order
- the European Small Claims Procedure
- Protection measures in civil matters
- the “Order for payment” procedures
Enhancement of cooperation between Member States' justice systems is a driving principle of the European Guide for Legal Expertise that is a result of several years’ work of judges, lawyers, academics and experts led by the European Expertise and Expert Institute (EEEI).
The Guide provides framework recommendations that can be adapted by each Member State and each justice system, ensuring quality and usable practices in judicial expertise. It contains best practice recommendations on expert proceedings, on certification, on ethics and status, and on the creation of a European list of experts. Part of these recommendations can already be applied by experts, in particular: the declaration of independence at the beginning of each expert evaluation, the purchase of insurance, the practice of drafting a pre-report, and the writing of a structured report.
This page is maintained by the European Commission. The information on this page does not necessarily reflect the official position of the European Commission. The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any information or data contained or referred to in this document. Please refer to the legal notice with regard to copyright rules for European pages.
The Commission is in the process of updating some of the content on this website in the light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.
Last update: 21/01/2019