Art. 7:500BW implements provision of Articles 2 and 5 of the Directive, defining the package travel as well as the organizer. Since the parties argued as to whether the travel agency could be seen as an organizer and whether a package travel contract was concluded, the court addressed this issues. Firstly, it referred to the CJEU’s case law (Club-Tour C-400/00) stating that package should be interpreted as also encompassing trips put together by a travel agency at a traveller’s request. The criteria of ‘pre-organized package’ should be understood as pertaining to combination of touristic services that were put together at the moment of conclusion of the contract. However, also in case of putting different services together into one package in order to assess whether the travel agency could be seen as an organizer one needs to see whether the travel agency concluded the contract in its own name. That would mean that the travel agency obliged itself to perform the contractual obligations, i.e., arrange the trip. A travel agency which reserves the trip with one or more other travel agencies at a consumer’s request is not itself responsible for the performance of the trip, since it does not conduct business in its own name. However, in the given case the travel agency could be seen as an organizer pursuant to art. 7:500 BW. Firstly, it did not matter that the package was put together on the traveller’s initiative (Club-Tour). Secondly, out of the presented facts it seemed reasonable for the Club of 10 to assume that they had concluded a contract with the travel agency. The travel agency, e.g., indicates the other travel organizations that helped in organizing the trip as its agents in the United States. Moreover, all the communication about the trip was received from the travel agency and they also sent all confirmations of reservations.