By analyzing the number of kilometres indicated on the invoices of purchase of the car by the defendant, the Authority established that several odometers were indeed altered.
Following the investigation carried out by the Criminal Police, the Authority found out that the defendants altered the odometers with help of a collaborating workshop. It was also established that the defendants inserted the false information in the respective guarantees of the altered vehicles.
According to the Authority, by their conduct, the defendants omitted to provide information concerning the main characteristics of the advertised products. The Authority concluded that consumers did not have necessary information to be able to take an informed transactional decision, causing them to take a transactional decision that they would not have taken otherwise.
In a short reasoning, the Authority further pointed out that the alteration of drawn kilometres cannot be justified even in cases where an engine of a vehicle was changed because the mileage indicated the overall life of the vehicle and not only the life of the engine. Neither was the defendant's defense withheld, that the cars were to be used internally only.
As a result, taking into account the gravity and duration of the commercial practice, the Authority concluded that the defendants have breached the prohibition on unfair commercial practices.