• Rechtssachenbeschreibung
    • Nationale Kennung: Higher Regional Court, Judgment 2 U 96/17
    • Mitgliedstaat: Deutschland
    • Gebräuchliche Bezeichnung:“Minigalerie” (mini gallery)
    • Art des Beschlusses: Gerichtsbeschluss im Rechtsmittelverfahren
    • Beschlussdatum: 15/02/2018
    • Gericht: Oberlandesgericht
    • Betreff:
    • Kläger:
    • Beklagter:
    • Schlagworte: cessation order, commercial offer, distance selling, selling price, price indication, price information, unit price, transparency, decision to purchase, proof of intention
  • Artikel der Richtlinie
    Price Indication Directive, Article 2 Price Indication Directive, Article 2, (a) Price Indication Directive, Article 2, (b) Price Indication Directive, Article 3 Price Indication Directive, Article 3, 4. Price Indication Directive, Article 4 Price Indication Directive, Article 4, 1.
  • Leitsatz


    An automatically generated “mini-gallery” of a product does not contain a sales offer, in the sense of the PAngV (Regulation on price quotation).

  • Sachverhalt

    The defendant contractually agreed to a cease-and-desist declaration to refrain from publishing and/or maintaining offers on the eBay trading platform concerning decorative textiles.

  • Rechtsfrage

    The plaintiff claimed a contractual penalty.

  • Entscheidung

    A "mini-gallery" of product views automatically generated by eBay without legible information on material and intended use does not constitute an offer within the meaning of article 2 paragraph 1 PAngV because it does not lead to a purchase decision by the visitor. Therefore, there is no obligation to indicate the basic price within the framework of the Minigalerie View.

    In this case, the cease-and-desist declaration is interpreted with regard to an advertisement without a basic price, in order to determine whether the advertisement actually infringes the cease-and-desist declaration.

    Volltext: Volltext

  • Verbundene Rechtssachen

    Keine Ergebnisse verfügbar

  • Rechtsliteratur

    Keine Ergebnisse verfügbar

  • Ergebnis

    The applicant's appeal against the judgment of the Rottweil Regional Court of 19 May 2017 (Case No 5 O 72/16) is dismissed.

    In this case, the “Mini-gallery” view does not constitute an offer according to the Preisangabenverordnung, and thus, no infringement of the cease-and-desist obligation can be concluded.